RESEARCH MISCONDUCT POLICY

Research Misconduct Policy
  • Maintains a zero-tolerance stance against actions compromising academic integrity, including data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and citation manipulation.

Anti-Plagiarism Policy

  • Screening & Verification: All submitted manuscripts are screened using industry-standard similarity check software prior to peer review.
  • Acceptable Thresholds: Strict similarity boundaries are enforced. Text recycling or excessive overlap leads to immediate rejection.
  • Post-Publication Action: Proven plagiarism post-publication results in formal retraction and potential institutional notification.

Data Fabrication & Falsification Policy

  • Data Integrity: Strict prohibition against inventing data (fabrication) or manipulating research images/processes (falsification).
  • Raw Data Requests: The journal reserves the right to request raw data files, original images, or analytical logs for validation.

Citation Manipulation Policy

  • Unjustified Citations: Prohibits excessive self-citation, coercive citations, or reference padding designed to inflate metric scores.
  • Relevance: Every citation must be directly relevant and verified during review.

Allegation Investigation Process (COPE Guidelines)

  • Formal Procedure: Follows standard Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) flowcharts to investigate all ethical concerns.
  • Confidentiality & Rights: Ensures unbiased, confidential inquiries while providing accused parties a right to respond with evidence.

Retraction, Correction, and Expression of Concern Policy

  • Erratum / Corrigendum: Published for minor technical or typographical errors that do not alter the main scientific conclusions.
  • Expression of Concern: Issued if an inquiry into potential misconduct is ongoing or inconclusive.
  • Article Retraction: Applied in cases of unrecoverable errors, severe ethical breaches, or data manipulation in line with COPE Retraction Guidelines.